|

any
perceive that professionalism in the practice of medicine has eroded
to an alarming degree. From this perspective, physicians have surrendered
their professional autonomy to business managers and to the companies
they work for; their self-regulation to lawyers and the courts; their
scientific mission to companies more concerned with sales than with
science; and the education of their students and their peers to drug
companies, whose funding comprises a growing and essential share of
the education budget. This erosion of professionalism is viewed not
as the result of any plan but as the sum of countless accommodations
by physicians to their evolving social, economic, legal, and regulatory
environments, all of which place even the most conscientious physicians
in positions of conflict of interest.
Medical professionalism is a set of issues spanning the social sciences,
history, economics, law, and ethics. The working group on Professionalism
includes individuals interested in exploring the concept of professionalism
in all of these dimensions. Since professionalism has been identified
as one of the most important elements in the curricular reform in
the medical school, key individuals who are working on these efforts
are participating in this working group. We hope that the deliberations
of the working group on professionalism will make concrete and practical
contributions to the new medical school curriculum.
Finally, we hope to build upon the synergistic talents of those involved
to explore possible research projects related to professionalism and
moral development. What are the factors that promote or erode the
qualities of professionalism during medical school, post-graduate
training, and medical practice? What are possible strategies for countering
this erosion at each of these levels? How can we evaluate whether
these strategies are effective? At a conceptual level, how do professional
ideals change in response to changing practice patterns, such as has
occurred with the shift towards managed care? Does professionalism
involve a commitment to promoting social justice, and if so, what
are the bounds of this obligation? How does the concept of professionalism
vary across different continents and cultures, and are there lessons
to be learned from cross-cultural comparisons? The most recent accomplishment
of this working group was the second Ackerman Symposium, titled "Professionalism:
From Principles to Practice," which was held on April 8 and
9, 2005 (http://ackerman.med.harvard.edu/).
The working group on Professionalism is co-chaired by Professor Alan Brandt and Dr. Robert Troug. If you would like to participate in this working group, please contact Dr. Robert Truog (Robert.Truog@childrens.harvard.edu).
|